Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of an Integrated Wetland Management Plan: Case of Uluabat (Apollonia) Lake, Turkey

  • Note
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands have global, regional, and local values in terms of hydrologic, biogeochemical, and ecological criteria. Especially in developing countries such as Turkey, a continued unsustainable development process, which degrades nature, has also been threatening wetlands. The main problem is the relationship between the stakeholders and local economic interests, which is often conflicting. International agreements such as the Ramsar Convention are key actions for solving these problems in terms of wise-use principles. In this study, Uluabat Integrated Wetland Management Plan, which was prepared under Ramsar principles, has been evaluated as a case study. Uluabat is one of the most important wetlands, not only because of its regional and local usage, but also its global merits such as serving as a wintering and feeding area for some endangered species. The investigated plan is important for Turkey as a pioneer study. It can be seen as a framework rather than a comprehensive plan. It needs not only some revision in its content but also some additional activities, such as monitoring and evaluation. Integrating it with a regional rural development project is needed in order to achieve proposed objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Aksoy, E. and G. Özsoy. 2002. Investigation of multi-temporal land use/cover and shoreline changes of the Uluabat Lake Ramsar Site using RS and GIS. p. 318–325. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Land Use and Management. Çanakkale, Turkey.

  • Arriaga, L., M. Montano, and J. Vasconez. 1999. Integrated management perspectives of the Bahia de Caraquez zone and Chone River estuary, Ecuador. Ocean&Coastal Management 42: 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. 1994. Valuing environmental functions: tropical wetlands. Land Economics 70: 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B., M. C. Acreman, and D. Knowler. 1997. Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. IUCN Publications Services Unit, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, W. K., K. W. Cox, T. Haberlein, E. W. Manning, D. R. Witty, and D. A. Young. 1992. Wetland evaluation guide, sustaining wetland issues. North American Wetlands Conservation Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Paper No: 1992-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R., I. H. Langford, I. J. Bateman, and R. K. Turner. 1999. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change 1: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. 2000. A guide to wetland rehabilitation for community groups in New South Wales. The New South Wales (NSW) Wetland Management Policy, NSW Government, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haneman, W. M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesselink, J. P. 1996. Sustainability War Around Skocjan Bay-Economy vs Ecology. Department of Environmental Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotze, D. C. 2004. Guidelines for managing wetlands in forestry areas. Center for Environment and Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal Mondi Wetlands Project Report, Gauteng, South Africa.

  • Kriström, B. 1990. Valuing environmental benefits using the contingent valuation method, an econometric analysis. Land Economics 66: 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Living Lakes Organization Official Web Site. 2004. Available from www.livinglakes.org

  • Llamas, M. R. 1998. Conflicts between wetland conservation and groundwater exploitation: two case histories in Spain. Environmental Geological Water Science 11: 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales State Wetland Action Group Official Website. 2005. Available from www.dlwc.nsw.gov.au

  • Özesmi, U. 2001. Wetland-Human relationships on the Uluabat Lake. World Wide Fund-Turkey Report, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Pfauth, M. and M. Sytsma. 2004. The report of integrated aquatic vegetation management plan for Blue Lake. On behalf of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Metro Regional Authority and Interlachen Homeowners Association. Fairview, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V. 2001. Restoration and management strategies of wetlands in developing countries. Electronic Green Journal Issue 15. Available from http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu

  • Ramsar Convention Official Website. 2004. Available from www. ramsar.org

  • Ramsar Convention Secreteriat. 2004. The Ramsar Convention Manual: a Guide to the Convention on Wetlands. The Ramsar Convention, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvius, M. J., M. Oneka, and A. Verhagen. 2000. Wetlands: Lifeline for people at the edge. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 25: 645–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siphan, O. 2004. Ecotourism in the wetlands of Cambodia. p. 37–40. In M. Torell, A. M. Salamanca, and B. D. Ratner (eds.) Wetlands Management in Cambodia: Socioeconomic, Ecological, and Policy Perspectives. World Fish Center Press, Penang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophal, M. 2004. Sustainable use and management of Cambodian Wetlands: Social and institutional challenges. p. 22–24. In M. Torell, A. M. Salamanca, and B. D. Ratner (eds.) Wetlands Management in Cambodia: Socioeconomic, Ecological, and Policy Perspectives. World Fish Center Press, Penang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolba, M. K. and O. A. El-Kholy. 1992. The World Environment 1972–1992. Chapman and Hall on behalf of the United Nations Environment Program, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. 1992. Policy failures in managing wetlands. p. 31–39. In OECD Market and Government Failures in Environmental Management. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., C. J. M. Jeroen, B. Söderqvist, T. A. Barendregt, J. Straaten, E. Maltby, and E. C. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics 35: 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uluabat Wetland Management Report. 2002. The Ministry of Environmental and Forestry Press, Bursa, Turkey.

  • World Fish Center Official Web Site. 2005. Available from www.worldfishcenter.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gürlük, S., Rehber, E. Evaluation of an Integrated Wetland Management Plan: Case of Uluabat (Apollonia) Lake, Turkey. Wetlands 26, 258–264 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[258:EOAIWM]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[258:EOAIWM]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation